Category: 2020

Pay for Success Finance-- Gambling our Pain

4/26/2020

       Pay for success finance deals rely on pain and prey on the poor,

     “Pay for success” finance is a performance-based contracting system that has been applied to a wide range of social issues ranging from pre-k, mental health and elder-care services to workforce training and supportive housing. It's clear to some that “pandemic preparedness” is being fitted out for pay for success profit-taking, too.
Full Article Here pay-for-success-finance-preys-upon-the-poor-presentation-at-left-forum-6-29-19/

The “pay for success” finance model works as follows:
1. Identify a social problem. In this case the possibility of a pandemic.

2. Get an academic institution or think tank to cost out the problem as a negative. Remember, the more expensive the problem, the bigger the potential profit from preemptively “fixing” it.

3. Establish an equation that fixes a rate of return for “evidence-based” “solutions.”

4. Select the type of data, the parameters, that determine “success” for the deal.

5. Set up infrastructure to track the data and provide “evidence” of success.

6. Identify partners – service provider, investors, and project oversight.

7. Deliver the services and collect the data. This may include inflicting the pain or aggravating the problem-- for the service provider and client's money gains to be forthcoming.

8. After a third party determines if success metrics were met, performance payments are issued to investors (or not).

    Pay for success finance deals will be well served by the global vaccine market that is being advanced through Gates’s outfit GAVI. Vaccine doses are readily quantifiable, and the economic costs of many illnesses are straightforward to calculate. With a few strategic grants awarded to prestigious universities and think tanks, I anticipate suitable equations framing out a healthy ROI (return on investment) will be devised to meet global market demands shortly.   Source: Get great news at https://wrenchinthegears.com/
More -- Pay for success finance deals Global Vaccine Market Pay for Success -- https://www.who.int/immunization/research/forums_and_initiative/1_ABatson_Global_Vaccine_Market_gvirf16.pdf
    An extensive overview at
https://WrenchInTheGears.com/2019/06/26/pay-for-success-finance-preys-upon-the-poor-presentation-at-left-forum-6-29-19/

        Over the past month, the gaze of investigative researchers has been fixed on GAVI, Bill Gates, Gates’s associates like Fauci, and the over-size influence they are having on public health policy around Covid-19.
      Use the link for the map to dig further into the relationships. The members of the 2012 Development Impact Bond (DIB) Working Group Report are of particular interest, since DIBs are being considered as a way to finance vaccination campaigns.
      Public health is a servant of bond markets and financiers. A glance at the participants in this working group makes it clear, doses and people and death and suffering are just going to be part of their market analysis. For too many people, openly discussing concerns about vaccines remains a third-rail. But we DO have to learn how to talk about this to one another, because the stakes are too damn high to shy away from it. I also believe these campaigns and the tracking systems associated with them have been structured as an imperial enterprise and should be treated with profound caution.
Interactive version of Fauci / Gates map viewable here.

    The World Bank started promoting the use of Blockchain to track vaccine supplies as early as 2017, the same year they got into the pandemic bond business.
More on that here.   https://wrenchinthegears.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/blockchain-vaccines-world-bank.jpg?w=768
                     -------------------------------------------

    In 2018, the World Bank and the World Health Organization partnered on an initiative called the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. Its task is to oversee member nations and identify pandemic preparedness “gaps.” Gaps is a red flag for technocracy. Once a social problem is turned into data, it can be put onto a dashboard and twisted to serve the needs of global markets. The “gap” between the data as it currently is and that which is desirable allows public services and resources to be placed under the control of systems engineers, technocrats. The following excerpt is taken from a paper prepared by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in 2019. It speaks to the desire for data to “motivate” and “measure.”
https://wrenchinthegears.com/2019/09/22/sustainability-for-financiers-what-climate-marchers-need-to-know-about-the-un-sustainable-development-goals/
      https://wrenchinthegears.com/2019/06/26/pay-for-success-finance-preys-upon-the-poor-presentation-at-left-forum-6-29-19/

       Data-driven “pay for success” deals are structured around the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). “Health” is goal number three. The World Bank has played a role in creating new investment products aligned to the UN SDGs. You can read more about the UN SDG financial apparatus here.   https://wrenchinthegears.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/stakeholder-capitalism.jpg?w=76 part deleted
https://wrenchinthegears.com/2020/04/13/mind-the-gap-the-violence-of-pandemic-dashboards/
    Source: Wrench In The Gears.com     WrenchInTheGears.com

0 Comments

Social Distance & Masks may Grow Fatalities

4/26/2020

0 Comments

The GreenMedInfo Newsletter

April 25, 2020
      The global shutdown and indefinite suspension of most social and economic activity in the United States and abroad is predicated on the widely held assumption that the science on social distancing measures is settled, and that this singular strategy has been and will continue to be effective in "flattening the coronavirus curve."

         If only the science were that simple. In today's featured article, we report on compelling research from 2018 published in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface that predicts a counterintuitive worsening of disease outcomes and the size of epidemics as a result of social distancing measures.
I believe we have a right and even obligation to question health policy decisions and proclamations by elected officials and private and public health authorities when evidence is either lacking or contradictory, and when their implementation is having dire consequences to our socioeconomic, physical and psychological health and well-being, as well as to our civil liberties.
If you are interested in going deeper into these topics, visit QuestioiningCovid.com -- a place where "Clinicians, Researchers, & Health Experts from Around the World Interrogating the Mainstream Narrative Around the Pandemic."

Also, please learn more about our campaign with Stand for Health Freedom to educate mayors and governors about coronavirus facts and statistics which many are unaware of.

Thanks for your interest in our work!

Warm regards

   __________________________________________________________________

QuestioiningCovid.com -- a place where "Clinicians, Researchers, & Health Experts from Around the World Interrogating the Mainstream Narrative Around the Pandemic."

0 Comments

Investigative How- To

4/26/2020

0 Comments

Investigating Viral Stories & a Crisis
         by Jon Rappoport

Engineering nature = unpredictable result.
   Not saying what to do but that all think carefully.
     Germs and viruses are everywhere. Bodies are made to deal. Postpone viral deaths in one population (some say worsens) while millions die from worldwide economic shock, addiction, overcrowding, bad water, sanitation, food, etc.
    You can't engineer nature...

We should be asking more BASIC questions at every turn. Article from Jon Rappoport
“If public health officials and governments announce an outbreak and a virus, I ask, "How did they discover the new virus?" That's a reasonable inquiry. "Did they really find and isolate a new virus?" "What procedures did they use for the job?" "Are those procedures accurate and valid?" "Did the scientists who rushed to the outbreak-locale to take tissue samples-- are these the CDC or World Health Organization virus hunters who always find a new virus, even if, at the designated location, an industrial corporation is releasing torrents of polluted poison into the ground and the water?
CDC has money in vaccines--- so we must be wary of them.)

Which leads me to the next basic question: Assuming some harm is being visited on people, are there clear causes that have nothing to do with a virus, causes that would account for the profile of harm that has been announced? And if so, who would benefit from hiding these other clear causes by using the cover story of a virus? Corporations, governments? Who would benefit, on the back end, from the virus cover story? Drug companies? Vaccine companies?
I ask: how many cases of the "epidemic" have been announced? How many deaths? Exactly how are these cases being identified and counted? What diagnostic tests are being done? Are the tests accurate and valid? Again, this is a reasonable inquiry. If the authorities are claiming a certain number of people are being harmed, I want to find out HOW these "experts" are coming to that conclusion.
I ask: what is the list of symptoms being attributed to the "epidemic illness?" Are these symptoms so generalized they already fit large numbers of people without the claim that the cause is a new virus? For example, are typical flu-like symptoms, which apply to millions of people, suddenly being shifted over and counted as cases of the "new epidemic?"
I ask: in all modern epidemics, are there common, long-accepted medical tests and procedures which are arbitrary and unproven, which should be openly debated, but aren't? Is the story of a virus used to hide corporate and/or government crimes?
There are other questions I ask, but you get the idea. I go under the cover story of the moment and look for more fundamental lies and truths. I hit the "stress points" of the cover story.
These basic questions have generated all my previous articles on the current "coronavirus crisis."
      How- To
     I keep asking, looking, and answering.
   If I find out, in asking and answering these questions that,
   > questionable procedures have been used in discovering the new virus in the first place;
   > unworkable, dubious, and worthless tests have been used to diagnose and label patients with the epidemic disease;
   > cases are undoubtedly "imported" from traditional diseases, in order to falsely inflate the number of cases in the epidemic;
   > causes of illness, other than the virus, are present in an area where the epidemic started;
> the epidemic illness is a familiar generalized list of symptoms present in millions of people---
    > if I find out all these things, then the "new epidemic" with a new viral cause is a con job.
   > If, after getting to the actual facts, stripping away the number of people claimed to be "epidemic cases" who most likely aren't,
    > If I find that the true number of cases appears to be small, then there is no epidemic.
> If the number of cases still seems to be high, then I look deeper into non-viral causes which are currently operating, and influencing illness.
    For my findings on this "coronavirus epidemic," I suggest going back and reading all my articles in this ongoing series. For those who have been with me from the beginning, I thank you for your support and interest.

FYI SARS
I'll close this piece with an example. In 2003, there was another coronavirus epidemic: SARS. Its symptoms were basic flu with, in some cases, acute respiratory problems. As I've detailed, a Canadian biologist, Frank Plummer, working for the World Health Organization, spoke frankly to the press, saying the number of SARS patients with the coronavirus was fewer and fewer. In fact, it was approaching zero. This, obviously, cut the legs out from under the claim that SARS was a new disease caused by a new coronavirus.
Where did SARS begin? Where was it first found? Guangdong, China. In their excellent book, Virus Mania, Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Kohnlein explore non-virus causes of flu-like illness in that locale. They found causes. It turns out this area is one of the world's largest re-cyclers of e-waste:
"Guangdong is China's largest industrial area...extremely polluted. Garbage lies everywhere; above all high-tech waste...For $1.50 a day, locals disassemble computers, monitors and printers with their bare hands, endangering both their own health and the environment... There, workers empty toner cartridges from laser printers the whole day long without protective masks, breathing in fine carbon dust. Others, mostly women and girls, dip circuit boards into baths of liquid lead to separate and collect the soldering materials with which the memory chips and processors are attached to the plates. Unprotected, they are exposed to toxic fumes. While the plastic plates are simply burned up, the chips and processors are put in acid baths, to extract their gold. Here as well, poisonous fumes are generated, and the unusable leftover acids are just dumped into the river. A lot of garbage is simply burned up or dumped onto rice fields, irrigation facilities or into waterways. The bodies of water and groundwater around Guiys have become so contaminated that drinking water has to be brought in daily from other cities..."
A real cause of real illness. No need for a virus. Except...(possibly) as a cover story.

Articles from Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

0 Comments

Not a Believer-- In A Nutshell

4/21/2020

0 Comments

In a Nutshell--
We the people must consider the facts and choose what we believe and what we will do.

1. Not everyone believes that what’s being called a pandemic actually is endangering substantially more lives than the seasonal flu.

2. Many don’t believe the testing we’re relying on actually targets, and accurately reports, a unique Covid 19 virus that’s clearly different from CoronaVirus which has been around forever, and is a common cold or flu.

3. Many believe figures reporting deaths from what's called a pandemic are engineered by guidelines issued by the CDC and more to inflate the numbers. Iatrogenic (physician caused) fatalities (3rd cause of U.S.deaths), medicines and treatments can actually hasten death, but the professionals involved don’t even know it, because they don’t get the healing power of the body and pull out the heroics #1. Medicine can and does create symptoms (so-called “side effects”). Such deaths are uncounted in deaths said to be from covid. Also the added isolation and stresses add to the numbers much more than people know.

4. Many believe this lockdown is being used to implant extreme and dangerous social control measures in addition to the ones we see overused now. in addition to the many monetary and social gains accruing to big industries, big business, big rulers, big government, etc. this may well be about asserting stronger controls over populations.

5. Believe it or not, a growing number of people do NOT share the standard medical views on germs, contagion, etc. The picture is a little different-- or a lot different-- than its been portrayed. Fascinating science here.

6. You need to know that the medical model was never voted on or chosen as the go- to health care because of its effectiveness. Rather, it was pushed to the top by money interests in the late 1800’s. And it is still largely ruled by money.

7. This has been a huge shock. Many just want it to go away-- but it may not end anytime soon. The controlling powers in this thing may push it as far as they can. So its on us if we don’t decide for ourselves what we want and make it clearly known.

8. Much of what’s in these pages may be way too big for people to believe. Me too, for some of it. If calling it a “conspiracy theory”, etc., (name calling) can excuse us from investigating facts, we’re in trouble.

Question on "Conspiriacies": When advertisers, media, etc, team up to make money and gain advantage, is that a conspiracy? (Don’t they do it all the time?) Are those who expose it “conspiracy theorists”?

Many supporting details are in these pages.

Would you investigate??
Our Lives and our children's lives may well depend om it!

     How About YOU?
       "God gave us brains to use."
   Even though your first and well- trained instinct likely has you moving away form this new information--- Are you willing to look beyond what "everybody" is saying, to learn something more? Would you even investigate into something you've never given any serious time to, meanwhile having been well- inoculated with medical beliefs for your entire life??
   Could you spend as long looking at the most important thing ever for your health-- and your family's-- as you would spend on buying a home or a new car? Think about it...

0 Comments

Pay for Success Finance-- Gambling our Pain

Social Distance & Masks may Grow Fatalities

Investigative How- To

Not a Believer-- In A Nutshell

Categories

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact