 Truth- Seeking and Investigation---
Hallmark of Humanity On Seeking Truth A Bigger Picture To seek truth is a natural inclination of our hearts. Its been essential to the rise of the human race. One might also say our social nature also gives a huge advantage. It is this-- our very humanity-- that's so severely limited and threatened in this crisis. (among many other things) Let us challenge ourselves, our own long- standing assumptions and the like, bringing them to account for what is true in them, or what is not true. Then we can at last discard what doesn't work and begin with fresh attitudes and eyes. ________________________________________________ Foundations of the Self -- Solid or Shaky? At any time, we would do well to look into the very foundations of our lives.That which we have stood for and stood on, in. the crises of today, may have us asking: What could be the strongest force to heal our world-- for that is what we need, no less. The healing we need so urgently can not be only for us but also for our entire world. It is on us all to seek the most serious and timely healing for ourselves and for our kind. One most Great Source of amazing power, holding answers for our world, could be nothing less than Spirit or God as we may call it. By any name, it may have answers. Those who will may seek for truth within that context. Answers, if there are any, likely begin in Oneness. Investigate with all you've got-- Our Lives and our Children's Depend on it. More Investigation for Heart, Soul and Our World at TruthfulSearch.com Site Index Sister Links-- Unity and Soul --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The emblem of the modern human mind is the ability to reason and investigate truth. TruthfulSearch.com -- Investigation for Heart, Soul and Our World Article/ Video Index  Medicine complicates things. I doubt its planned, but the more complicated something is, the more money- making opportunities it can offer. M.D.s treat every disease differently, adding entire industries (pharmaceuticals) and specialties to their number. So many entities are involved here, each adding another layer of profiteers. If they aren't purposely supporting one another in that motive, now that would be a miracle! Medicine gives every illness its own name, diagnosis and treatment. As if the cause and treatment of inflammation in the elbow (bursitis) is different from that caused by sinusitis, appendicitis or sinusitis. In every case, the "cure" is in removal of the cause, and the cause is one and the same. Natural health teaches the unity of disease. The cause of almost all disease is one. It is exhaustion brought on by toxic conditions. Simply, a body overwhelmed by problematic conditions does not have the energy to do the inner cleanup necessary for daily life. Thus, toxins build up from natural processes and lifestyle issues that few are fully aware of. What happens when garbage piles up at home? It begins to stink and putrefy. Eventually the home (the body) must be evacuated. Disease is the result of unhealthy living. But no one want to think that. But it is not their fault. We've been tricked by fate and profits. For example, foods are engineered to cause cravings and addiction. People, too, are pretty ignorant of the causes, impact and proper regulation of health issues, stress, sleep and much more. Medical methods treat disease symptoms-- rarely do they remedy the cause. Medicines and treatments add to the body's toxic load, adding yet more overwhelm to an already diseased system. No wonder people over sixty have rampant disease conditions! Do Germs really cause Disease?
Germs are present in disease, but its never been scientifically proven that they cause disease. Can you believe it? Few would, but if at any time we're going to look into it, this would be the time! Germ theory is a theory, not a fact. The idea that bacteria cause disease is totally unproven. Truly, laboratories around the world have tried and failed at proving it. Investigate-- if you dare-- if you dare to challenge your old concepts, to open to optimal health, to free yourself from fear and the misnomers being used to propel this lockdown. Will these issues come up for public discussion? Not if we don't educate ourselves and others!  Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory by David Crowe
This article also relates to Germs & Germ Theory, Proofs and Falsehood in Covid Testing & More Link-- Antibody Testing For COVID The Myth of Corona Virus video by David Crowe PDF Full article at http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf More on Testing & the CDC vested interest The Myth of Corona Virus video by David Crowe The Infectious Myth.com/ Food for Thought: What are the body conditions under which harmful viruses proliferate? Why do some people have mild symptoms and others severe ones (besides the catch-all non-explanation of “low resistance”)? What positive role might flus, colds, and other non-lethal diseases play in the maintenance of health? War-on-germs thinking brings results akin to those of the War on Terror, War on Crime, War on Weeds, and the endless wars we fight politically and interpersonally. First, it generates endless war; second, it diverts attention from the ground conditions that breed illness, terrorism, crime, weeds, and the rest. Excerpts from the article : Viruses Fall Short of Science's Methods and Studies P. 4 Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch's postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”. That was a long time ago, but the problem continues. None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus or isloate it so as to make it more clearly ready for study. The word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing. For example. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is referred to as ‘isolating’ it for clear recognition and research. Reference [1] There is no way to tell that the RNA being used in the COVID-19PCR test is found in those particles seen in the electron micrograph, because you cannot see what the contents are, they could be protein, RNA or DNA. There is thus no connection between the test, and the particles, and no proof that the particles are viral.A similar situation was revealed in March 1997 concerning HIV,when two papers published in the same issue of the journal “Virology” revealed that the vast majority of what had previously been called “pure HIV” was impurities that were clearly not HIV,and the mixture also included micro-vesicles that look very similar to HIV under an electron microscope, but are of cellular origin.[5][6] Covid Tests P 8 Assuming, for a moment, the existence of a new coronavirus, what would a test tell us, at this stage? Or rather, what does it not tell us? •Without purification and exposing animals to viral particles we do not know if the virus is pathogenic (disease causing). It could be an opportunistic infection (invades unhealthy people with weakened immune systems) or a passenger virus (that is carried alongby risky behavior, such as eating an animal carrier of a virus). • We don’t know the false positive rate of the test without validating a large number of positive tests by attempting to purify virus. Every positive test for which virus could not be purified would be a false positive, and every negative test for which virus could be purified would be a false negative. But the virus has not yet been purified, so test validation is impossible. •If someone is sick there is no proof that any or all of their symptoms are due to the virus, even if it is present. Some people may be immune, some may have some symptoms caused by the virus, but others caused by the drugs they are given, by pre-existing health conditions, and so on. •We don’t know if the people who test negative are infected or not, especially when they show up with similar symptoms. For example, in [2], out of 59 patients with similar symptoms, only 41 tested positive, but the researchers were clearly not sure whether the remaining 18were truly uninfected. If they truly are not, they lend weight to COVID-19notbeing the cause of any of the illnesses, as they had symptoms indistinguishable from the 41 positives. Testing at such an early stage of knowledge is incredibly dangerous. It spreads panic, it can put people on dangerous medications, other circumstances of their treatment can be physically and psychologically damaging (such as intubation and isolation, and even seeing all the doctors and nurses in special suits emphasizing how deathly sick you are).False Negatives –Big Problem According to an article in the South China Morning Post[23], Li Yan, head of the diagnostic center at the People’s Hospital of Wuhan University, noted on Chinese state TV that because of the multi-step process, an error at any stage could result in an incorrect outcome. This was echoed by reference [26] which noted the possibility of errors in the many steps from the time of specimen collection through processing.Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, also on CCTV, said the accuracy is only 30 to 50 percent. Wang Chen really means, however, that the test only ever produces false negatives, and never false positives.In a paper documenting a cluster of illness and positives tests in a family [3], this bias is clear, as most patients had more negative tests than positive tests, but were considered positive anyway. P 9 The only way to decide logically and scientifically is to have a gold standard for presence of the virus, which can only be purification and characterization(identification of the RNA and proteins). Since this has never been accomplished, doctors get to make decisions on the fly, biased towards treating patients as infected. False Positives –Best Evidence The first major attempt to define the false positiveratewas in a paper describing a new test methodology, but it has a built-in conflict of interest [19]. Clearly, if the false positive rate was high, the authors’ aim to “develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings”, would have failed. They did, however, do more than most. They took297 samples of nasal and throat secretions from bio banks and tested them, only finding “weak initial reactivity” in four samples which, upon retesting, disappeared. The problem with this kind of analysis is that biobank samples may not have been obtained in the same way as samples from live people in an epidemic panic. The sampling was also not blinded, something that is necessary to eliminate the possibility of unconscious bias (a real problem in medicine). Furthermore, many samples in people believed to be infected are negative, and multiple samples are tested, as described for the family cluster paper. RNA is fragile if not stored carefully, and this would cause false negative results. No information on whether the samples were stored in a way designed to maintain RNA integrity was given.In sum, testing 297 samples could, at best, show that the false positive rate was 1/300, but because multiple samples are often taken in current COVID-19 test protocols, with any one positive sample over-ruling all the negatives, the false positive rate could be considerably less, as the biobank samples were only tested once.And, even if this test did have a false positive rate that was very low, it is not clear this particular test’s false positive rate cannot be extrapolated to any other test design. Even a small false positive rate is critically important. A 99% accurate test would produce 100,000 false positives in a city of 10 million, like Wuhan. And if the number of positives in sampling is around 4% (which it appears to be from early statistics), then 1 out of 4 positives would be false. Finally, on March 5th2020 some Chinese scientists dropped a bombshell. According to their analysis, based on reasonable assumptions for asymptomatic people (e.g. contacts of other cases),“the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%”.[26] This is based on a mathematical analysis using reasonable assumptions for the actual prevalence of the virus, and the performance of the test. The best case, with the most optimistic assumptions, was still more than 40% false positives.3 P 10 Positive, Negative, Positive Again –Confusion Some people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test negative, and then tested positive again. According to a news report [22] patients are not considered cured in China until they no longer have symptoms, have clear lungs, and have two negative COVID-19tests. Despite this, 14% of discharged patients in Guangdong Province later tested positive, but with no relapse of symptoms. This is very difficult to explain if the test is for a virus, much easier to explain if the RNA that the test is looking for is not viral in origin. Later analysis showed similar results in Wuhan, with 5-10% declared to be “recovered” (negative tests after cessation of symptoms) later tested positive, often without symptoms [42]. Chinese scientists reported that29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3-6 test results that flipped between Negative, Positive and ‘Dubious’ (undefined, but probably means a PCR cycle number between positive and negative)[52]. One patient, for example had three negative tests interspersed by two positive tests. Others had one test result in each of the three categories. Other confusing test results are listed in Appendix A Negative, Negative, Negative A group of doctors in Marseille, France, working in a very experienced lab, that regularly does testing for respiratory viruses, reported testing 4,084 samples for COVID-19, using several systems approved for use in Europe, without a single positive [25]. This included 337 people returning from China who were tested twice, and 32 people referred because of suspected infection. It is statistically improbable that this lab was just lucky to not get any COVID-19 cases, it is more likely that they used more stringent criteria, illustrating that the performance of not just test kits, but labs, with this new test, is completely unknown.Yet, a positive test remains unquestioned in every case. Preserve the test Overall, it seems that test results must be interpreted to preserve the coronavirus theory. No alternative interpretation is allowed. And when there is an inconsistency, it must be ignored or explained away, often invoking imaginary data. These situations are listed in Appendix C. Test Experience A paper from Singapore by doctors and public health officials provides a revealing look atthe inner guts of COVID-19 testing. Hidden away in the supplementary materials. * NOTE: The abstract was eventually withdrawn, but without any explanation, indicating it was a political removal. The original Chinese language article was not retracted by the journal. This may be the first time ever that an abstract alone has been withdrawn (24], where few people will see it, it exposes;;; Some important issues with tests: •The test is not binary (negative/positive)and has an arbitrary cutoff. •The quantity of RNA does not correlate with illness. •If negative means uninfected and positive means infected, then people went from infected to uninfected and back again, sometimes several times. •Results below the cutoff are not shown, and are treated as negative, but if PCR continued past the cutoff and was eventually positive, this would indicate presence of small quantities of the RNA which is supposedly unique toCOVID-19 (i.e. infection).Before you read beyond the following figure, ask yourself why the first 6 graphs, shown deliberately out of numerical order, are separated. What are the visual differences between those 6 and the remainder? Do this right away so my interpretation does not bias your opinion. Get the Graph here>> Myth of Corona Virus here-- http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf on Pg. 11-- many visuals, etc. and this article in its entirety. Notes & References on Pgs. 33- 44 Full article here>> Myth of Corona Virus here-- http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf-- you will find many visuals, etc. and this article in its entirety. From here things get more complicated, a bit much for some.It can also be best to read it yourself. http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf ------------------------------------------------------------ Covid Testing continued Page 14 Positive to Negative and Back Again The majority of the 18 patients had a positive test, followed by a negative test, followed by a positive test. Some had this several times.If a negative test means uninfected, then this is impossible. You cannot rid yourself of the virus, and then be re-infected the next day, and then infected the day after,and then become uninfected again.Or, if rapid re-infectionis possible in a hospital setting, then the virus must be simply everywhere and fighting it is totally useless.The simplest answer to this conundrum is that negative tests do not mean uninfected. But the corollary is that positive tests do not mean infected. Which would make the test worthless. Page 16 Transmission There is lots of evidence that the virus is not as transmissible as is being implied.(January 2) “27 (66%) [of 41 early] patients had direct exposure to Huanan seafood market [i.e. about 1/3 did not]”. [2]. (January 1-20) “Of the 99 patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia, 49 (49%) had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market.” [10] [i.e. 51% did not](January 1-January 22) A larger survey, including all the first 425 cases, showed that of those diagnosed January 1stor later, 72% had “No exposure to either market or person with respiratory symptoms”.[13]“The symptom onset date of the first patient identified was Dec 1, 2019. None of his family members developed fever or any respiratory symptoms. No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases.”[2](of the family cluster) “None of the family members had contacts with Wuhan markets or animals...They had no history of contact with animals, visits to markets including the Huanan seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, or eating game meat in restaurants.” [3](March 3) “Nearly 80% of patients with the new coronavirus in Japan have not passed on the infection to others regardless of the degree of their symptoms, a government panel of experts announced on March 2.”[43](May 6) The majority of recently hospitalized patients in New York are people who have followed the precaution of staying home. 66% were retired or unemployed and not commuting to work [80]. Examples are given about Transmission--- the briefest are: Transmission 3 –Illinois Couple A paper in Lancet made a big deal about the presumed first case of person-to-person contact in the USA, from a woman who had visited Wuhan in December 2019, to her husband, who had stayed in the United States. She got sickafter returning, and later both her and her husband, who had not traveled to Wuhan, tested positive for COVID-19[31]. Whether he had symptoms or not was impossible to tell because he had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, so had a cough and difficulty breathing all the time. What is more interesting is that authorities identified 372 contacts of this couple, and “were able to assess exposure risk and actively monitor symptoms for 347”. Not one of these people had an emergency room visit with respiratory symptoms within 14 days of contact with the couple. 43 did have some symptoms that could have been COVID-19, and became “Persons Under Investigation” (PUIs). 26 had had exposures to the couple classified as“medium risk or greater”. But despite the presence of symptoms, contact with the couple, and close monitoring, not one tested positive for COVID- Transmission 4 –Diamond Princess [33] The Diamond Princess cruise ship was a perfect laboratory for watching a highly infectious pathogen in action. The first person who tested positive had symptoms before boarding the ship on January 20th. It was not until February 1stthat they tested positive, and February 3rdwhen passengers were confined to their quarters, in some cases with someone who tested positive. Passengers had interactions with the crew, e.g. to obtain meals. Despite this, the rate of transmission was only 16.7%, meaning that 83.3% remained negative. Since almost half those who tested positive hadno symptoms it was not possible to avoid contact with positive persons based on observing symptoms, and it meant that 92% emerged from quarantine without having experienced symptoms due to COVID-19. Transmission 5- Magical? Numerous newspaper articles have noted cases outside China (where individual cases were still newsworthy) that had no known contact with another case, or travel to an endemic region (notably Wuhan). These are documented in Appendix 2 P 20-- Proving Transmission It is impossible, in most cases, to prove that someone did have contact with another COVID-19case, even if they did travel to Wuhan and visit the Huanan market. In the best case it will be possible to show that someone was in the vicinity of someone who tested positive earlier, but that does not constitute proof that they were exposed to the virus, let alone that it was that person who infected them. In most cases, even if someone was in Wuhan, there will be no evidence that a person was in contact with another victim. Fundamentally, this belief that it is contact that causes positive tests is necessary to preserve the infectious paradigm. Therefore, the slightest evidence of an association between an old case and a new case (such as having been in the same city at the same time) is taken as proof of transmission, when it is obviously not. Next the article goes into Treatment & Conclusions In the section on Treatment, it is shown that coronavirus positive patients who die are generally older and sicker than the general population. This means that they are less able to withstand aggressive treatment. It is known that the treatments have side effects, that these can be quite severe, but it is not yet known if any of them have benefits Pg 27 + Mortality There are four main questions to ask about mortality: 1.Are the number of cases significant in the context of normal mortality? 2.Is the death rate of cases higher than other similar diseases, such as influenza? 3.Who is dying? 4.Are there reasons for death other than a novel coronavirus? More details in the PDF Notes & References on Pgs. 33- 44 Full article here>> Myth of Corona Virus here-- http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf-- you will find many visuals, etc. and this article in its entirety. Number of Cases Many people are convinced that COVID-19 is a severe problem by the large number of deaths it is causing. For example, at the time of writing, Worldometer was reporting about 164,000 deaths from COVID-19, to date, representing about 0.002% of the global population. One reason this number is misleading is because it is a cumulative number, and not a weekly number. If we divide by the 8 weeks that, at the time of writing, the panic had been in western countries, it amounts to about 20,500 deaths per week, over the entire globe. Another reason the number is misleading is that few people have any idea how many people die on a weekly basis in their country. For example, in the United States, a country of about 325 million, there were about 2.8 million deaths in 2017 according to the CDC, or about 54,000 per week. So normal deaths in the United States per week are between two and three times larger than global deaths due to the coronavirus. Page 27 Death Rate of Cases While ordinary people might have been panicking due to the sheer scale of the number of deaths, medical and scientific people were panicking over the high death rate. The death rate is simply the number of deaths from coronavirus divided by the total number of cases. A problem is that the number of cases who have been discovered may be vastly less than the real number of cases, because asymptomatic people are much less likely to be tested, and this dramatically increases the apparent death rate. Secondly, people may be recorded as coronavirus deaths when it was not the main cause of death, and this also dramatically increases the apparent cause of death.As an example, take a town that has 100 confirmed coronavirus cases and 10 deaths. The death rate is 10% which is 100 times more than influenza(0.1%). But a recent study, using an antibody survey, found that there were 50-85 times more people positive in Santa Clara County, hard hit by the COVID-19 panic, than confirmed cases would indicated. Then a 10% death rate would drop to between 0.2% and 0.1%. But what if only 12% of people registered as coronavirus deaths actually died from the coronavirus death, as the scientific advisor to Italy’s Minister of Health, stated in an interview with Britain’s Daily Telegraph [62]? Then a 10% death rate declines to under 1%. The United States also has a policy of recording most deaths of coronavirus-positive people as deaths from the coronavirus, even if the death was obviously from one of their pre-existing health conditions combined with old age[62].In Belgium, all deaths at retirements homes are classified as COVID-19 although only 5% have tested positive for the virus [71].Similarly, 55 deaths at a nursing home in Brooklyn, USA, were classified as COVID-19 despite the fact that, “not a single resident has been able to get tested for the virus to this day” [72].If we multiply the number of coronavirus cases by 50 while taking 12% of the deaths as truly from coronavirus, then our 10% death rate drops to 0.02%, which is significantly less than influenza. P 28 Next the paper goes into... Who is Dying? Coronavirus patients are generally older and weaker than the general population. Many details on this are in the original document-- http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf-- you will find many visuals, etc. and this article in its entirety. More-- Non-Viral Causes of Death It is generally believed that any surplus deaths seen since February could only have been caused by COVID-19. Unfortunately, due to the evolving situation, and dearth of the appropriate information, quantifying these deaths is currently impossible. There are actually several ways in which our panic could have caused death. •Aggressive medical treatment. •Isolation. •Delaying going to hospital. •Consequences of home confinement. •Consequences of germphobia. •Air Pollution. More... Aggressive medical treatment The Treatment section above describes the special medical treatments that are only given to people who test coronavirus positive or who, in some cases, are believed to be coronavirus infected based on symptoms. Both intubation and drug treatments have side effects that can be fatal, although it is not possible at present to quantify the number of deaths being cause. Isolation COVID-19 patients are generally isolated from the outside world, not able to see visitors, and not seeing staff as humans because they are hidden behind layers of personal protective gear. The literature on the benefits of visitation to patients is too vast to cite here, but visitors can help patients understand what medical staff are saying and proposing to do, provide emotional comfort, relieve boredom, and make the patient continue to believe that their life is worth the struggle to continue. If the only people seen are in protective gear that further emphasizes the dire circumstances, and the small likelihood of recovery. Delaying Treatment In the United Kingdom the government put up posters that have messages similar to this: “If you or anyone in your household has a high temperature or a new and continuous cough -even if it’s mild, (A) Everyone in your household must stay at home for 14 days and keep away from others; (B) DO NOT go to your GP, hospital or pharmacy; (C) Only call NHS 111 if you can’t get online or your symptoms worsen.”This is a very clear message that sick people must stay home. In most cases their symptoms probably resolve, but if they progress to pneumonia the affected person may still delay going to the hospital, and when they do arrive their pneumonia may be much further advanced than under normal circumstances. Patients may also decide for themselves that they do not want to go to an Emergency Room because of the perception that it will be full of people infected with COVID-19, and a certain way to pick up the infection. In New York, people in cardiac arrest whose hearts cannot be restarted at the scene will not be driven to the hospital for further resuscitation attempts, according to the New York Post on April 2nddue to fear that hospitals are overwhelmed with coronavirus patients (nypost.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-nyc-emts-stop-taking-cardiac-arrest-patients-to-hospitals). By contrast, in Birmingham, in the UK, paramedics are told to pick up the patient but not to start chest compressions or ventilation in the ambulance, but to wait until they arrive at the hospital, due to fear of contamination of the ambulance with COVID-19 (https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1282). Consequences of home confinement In Canada, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, a legal action group, wrote to Prime Minister Trudeau and provincial premiers, asking their governments to quantify various harms from home confinement and other restrictions on movement and association, including deaths from •Increased suicide rates, e.g. due to unemployment, bankruptcy or hopeless poverty :due to loss of employment or closure of a small business. •Deaths from alcoholism and drug abuse, exacerbated by loss of employment, loss of social interactions and isolation. •Domestic abuse from forcing partners to stay in close quarters for extended periods of time, when one of the partners is already abusive. •Deaths of elderly, infirm people due to lack of visitors to observe their deteriorating physical and mental condition. •Deaths from cancellations of elective surgeriesor from inability to access hospital services. An organization that is a “leading provider of data to NHS [National Health Service] trusts”(Edge Health)warned on April 25th that there might already be 2,000 medical deaths per week from the non-COVID impacts of the coronavirus panic, such as among stroke, heart attack and diabetes patients who can no longer access needed services [76].•Future deaths from increased poor health in children (e.g. diabetes) who have few opportunities for exercise or fresh air. Consequences of Germphobia Modern societies have long had a fear of microbes, with many people seeing them only as a source of sickness, despite many foods containing bacteria or fungi, such as cheese, yogurt, kefir, miso soup, kombucha, pickles, olives, kimchi, sauerkraut (if not pasteurized), tempeh and more.The coronavirus panic has led to vastly increased (although probably futile) efforts at disinfection of any surfaces that people could come in contact with. This may well cause long term problems, such as the development of cancer, but in the short term it has already been associated with a sharp increase in calls to US poison control centers, according to the CDC [65]. Air Pollution Many people noted that both Wuhan and Lombardy Italy, two hotspots for coronavirus deaths, also suffered from heavy air pollution. Now there is some scientific support for this. Harvard University scientists found that an increase of 1 microgram of fine particulates per cubic meter was associated with an8% increase6in COVID-19 deaths [68]. An Italian study concluded that, “people living in an area with high levels of pollutant are more prone to develop chronic respiratory conditions and suitable to any infective agent. Moreover, a prolonged exposure to air pollution leads to a chronic inflammatory stimulus, even in young and healthy subjects. We conclude that the high levelof pollution in Northern Italy should be considered an additional co-factor of the high level of lethality recorded in that area”[69]. Air pollution may leave people more vulnerable, both to any new health challenges, and to aggressive medical treatment Conclusions The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus. And which won’t be connected to a virus unless the virus is purified. Furthermore, even if the test can detect anovel virus the presence of avirus isnot proof that it is the cause of the severe symptoms that some people who test positive experience (but not all who test positive). Finally, even if the test can detect a virus, and it is dangerous, we do not know what the rate of false positives is. And even a 1% false positive rate could produce 100,000 false positive results just in a city the size of Wuhan and could mean that a significant fraction of the positive test results being found are false positives. The use of powerful drugs because doctors are convinced that they have a particularly potent virus on their hands, especially in older people, with pre-existing health conditions, is likely to lead to many deaths. As with SARS. There is very little science happening. There is a rush to explain everything that is happening in a way that does not question the viral paradigm, does not question the meaningfulness of test results, and that promotes the use of untested antiviral drugs. And, given enough time there will be a vaccine developed and, for some of the traumatized countries, it may become mandatory, even if developed after the epidemic has disappeared, so that proving that it reduces the risk of developing a positive test will be impossible. Notes & References on Pgs. 33- 44 Full article here>> Myth of Corona Virus here-- http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf-- you will find many visuals, etc. and this article in its entirety. Pasteur, who originated germ theory, later reversed his position, realizing that germ theory was flawed, and that germs were not the primary cause of disease. Koch’s postulates were the clincher. These provided a clear basis for scientific testing of the theory, The German scientist, Robert Koch, (1843-1910) a bacteriologist, physiologist and one of Pasteur's contemporaries, laid out the proper testing procedure, which is still considered an excellent example of scientific methods. If you read them you will see that they make perfect sense.
Koch maintained that for a specific bacteria to be the cause of a disease:
This is a modification of the germ theory, requiring a condition of susceptibility* to establish a causal relationship between specific germs and specific diseases. Without that condition, a germ can not be said to cause disease. Postulate #1 Disproven Scientists know that specific bacteria are not found in every case of a specific disease. The eminent Canadian physician, Sir William Osier (1849-1919) found that the diphtheria bacillus is absent in 28 to 40% of cases of diphtheria. Green's Medical Diagnosis says that tubercle bacilli may be present early, more often late, or in rare instances be absent throughout the disease condition. Koch's first postulate, "the specific bacteria must be found in every case of that disease" is not fulfilled in tuberculosis, diphtheria, typhoid fever, pneumonia, or any other disease. Specific bacteria are not found in every case of a specific disease. Postulate #2 Disproven Nor is the second postulate fulfilled, because it is a medically-known fact that bacteria are found in the bodies of humans and animals which exhibit no symptoms of any disease. Specific bacteria are repeatedly found when the specific disease is absent. Postulate #3 Disproven Further, bacteria are not capable of living outside the tissues; therefore, the third postulate is not fulfilled. Neither Pasteur nor any of his successors have ever induced disease by the inoculation of airborne bacteria, but only by injections from bodily sources. The reason is obvious: germs are dependent on human or animal organisms for their survival. Postulate #4 Disproven * "Koch's Fourth Postulate Re- stated reads: Introducing germ cultures in a healthy body or organism does not produce signs and symptoms of the disease. The Bio-Chemical Society of Toronto conducted a number of very interesting experiments in which pure cultures of typhoid, diphtheria, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and meningitis germs were consumed by the millions in food and drink by a group of volunteers. The results: no ill effects whatsoever." . From "The Germ Theory Reexamined" by Bob Zuraw and Bob Lewanski (Vegetarian World, Volume 3, Number 11, September-November 1977) But when the condition of susceptibility is introduced, this changes the whole concept. Thus we are back to the same point we have been emphasizing. In other words, although germs may be present in disease, they do not cause disease in every case, Again, the condition of the host is of primary importance in the production of disease. Of themselves, Germs Are Powerless To Cause Disease "The germ alone could no more cause disease than a match alone can produce a fire. Just as the fire. If it is to have any part in causing disease, the microbe must find an organism that produces a suitable soil for its activities. We cannot avoid germs. We must be proof against them. We can avoid disease only by keeping ourselves in the positive state of health such that bacteria are powerless against us." (February 1972, Dr. Shelton 's Hygienic Review), Numerous experiments have tried to produce various diseases by the feeding of germs, without any disease being produced. Such experiments by the U.S. Navy, again without results. Dr. Claunch says "These experiments, conducted under test conditions and under government supervision, with such disappointing results, should have knocked the last prop from under the germ theory. They doubtless would have done so if our government doctors had seen fit to make them public property. But alas, they did not. It would have been a great service to the people, but not good business for the doctors and serum manufacturers."Dr. S. K. Claunch, in Exploding the Germ Theory, 2. ibid. P 25 Sorry guys, We gotta wear 'em some places. Ouch! it hurts not to see those smiles, and those social cues... just masked faces. Studies show it causes us distress, no surprise! I feel worst for the kids Ow ow Ow We can Lighten Up a tough thing by pasting a "smile" on our mask with masking tape.  Also do tell people you're smiling at them! If you do it right they can hear the smile in your voice, and you can too! It will cheer you both up. I thank the Higher Powers for beautiful people, ingenuity, caring and love coming out so much now to counter our pain. Lets all be extra kind to make up for the hurt. ((()))))) _____________________
Kaua'i offer: Free Laughter Wellness Groups online on Zoom Free to All Comers Contact Lucky for next meetup. __________________________________  Pandemic- Panic Topics this site
__________________________________________________________________ Hope n Happiness -- No Matter What! Offering free Laughter Wellness Free Groups online __________________________________________________________________ Blog Articles & Videos Will YOU Investigate? Fascinating science here or watch gentle mind- opening video here. Not a Believer-- In A Nutshell We the people must consider the facts and choose what we believe and what we will do. ___________________________________________ Link here to : QuestioningCovid.com -- Interrogating the Mainstream Narrative Around the Pandemic."Stand for Health Freedom-- the Movement Flu, Corona Statistics & the Big Vaccine Push # 1 is Immune System Function -- What they won't Talk About.. Video with Dr. Shiva covers plenty of twists, lies and what's behind it... a brilliant man! Twisted Numbers Prove Little (Try following the Money) Health Policy Decisions -- Our Obligation to Question Links to Social Distancing May Harm more than help How Social Distancing & Isolation) Can Increase Mortality --13 Studies and Social Distancing May Worsen Epidemic Outcomes More Vested Interests-- Vaccines Plus Included: Proof linking Gates to vaccines and universal digital ID plus article links to excerpts on Gates---- Investigate "Hero"-- Dr. Anthony Fauci whose holdings include a dozen Big Pharma patents held by Anthony Fauci et. al. Dangers of Masks and Distancing Social Distance & Masks may Grow Fatalities Investigative How- To To Investigate-- or Get More of the Same Pay for Success Finance-- Gambling our Pain The Stakes Medicine, Money, Freedom and a Pandemic Don't Think its Ending Any too Soon-- includes A Worldwide Agenda? A colossal profiteer's agenda?-- Medicine, corporations, media in cahoots? & More in the making A Five- Pronged Plan--much more still unknown _________________________________________________________________________ More Links Below _____________________________________________________________________ Our children's lives, and our own-- are at stake. Educate Yourself! Video -- David Icke LOOK YOUR CHILDREN IN THE EYE": THE DANGERS OF ACQUIESCING TO POWER ____________________________________________ More Pan- Pertinent Videos with David Icke https://www.davidicke.com/ Extended Lockdowns a Form of Mass Torture https://www.davidicke.com/video/567015/extended-lockdowns-form-mass-torture-david-icke-talks-tradcatknight-podcast CoVId Magic Trick -- Testing Stats-- Now U See It-- but Don't Blink! https://www.davidicke.com/article/568656/dr-andrew-kaufman-exposing-covid-19-magic-trick-sleight-hand-transformed-society. Coronavirus -- As Deadly as They Say ? states: "Current estimates about the Covid-19 fatality rate may be too high by orders of magnitude." Also Another example of courageous critical thinking from the UK Kaua'ian Shares Pandemony n Panic Links 5 Tips to Keep up your Physical & Mental Health in COVID-19 Times _______________________________________________________  Freebies--
Positive Action for our World Unity and Soul-- Blog & Website To build Community for Ourselves and Our World - This Blog’s Origin & Purpose has been to Create Unity, Spirit and Hope for Kaua'i's neighborhoods and across the globe. Our Top #1 Worldwide longtime effort for over 30 years has now migrated to a new Blog & Website for Unity and Soul-- for Ourselves and Our World -- _______________________________________________________________ Laughter Wellness Free Groups online= Blog Help or Blog Master Needed-- To post & help post updates to this work on the Panic- Pandemic. _________________________________________________________ Link here to more Answers in Unity, Soul- Spirit & More--
At the beginning this goes into the CoronaVirus numbers and documentation using the CDC website's info on how deaths are documented as CV. Much more on this video.
one video was taken down because it had the V word (vacin, you know). Calls for immediate censorship there or on FB. You know who has money in it.... Received from GreenMedInfo.com & Stand for Health Freedom A non-profit, 501c4 organization Stand for Health Freedom I co-founded, to help empower citizens with a voice and bring rationality back into the present nationwide -- now live here, strongly in favor of sending the message to elected officials and key decision-makers "that government orders restricting healthy citizens and keeping nonessential businesses closed are causing widespread emotional, physical and financial devastation -- far more harmful than the risk of COVID-19 itself. And that outcomes will continue to worsen, unless we use reopen our communities, letting lawful, healthy citizens go back to work, school, church, and social gatherings." Here's a powerful campaign and action for you that you can engage in only a few clicks here NOW, enabling you to email your major and governor with your concerns.  Our Stand: Stand for Health Freedom -- Link Here Received from GreenMedInfo.com
Sayer Ji, Co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom, Author of REGENERATE |
World Hope
Top Answers
for our World-- Unity and Soul What's most Vital Hopeful is here. -------------------- ------------------- Happy is Here.
Sister Links-- Unity and Soul. New Blog at UnityAndSoul.com
Categories
All
Archives Entries by Topic
All topics « Addiction Baha'i Empowerment Family, Friends Health Hope & Strength Love Mind Our World Peace Peace , Spirit & Investig Publications Recovery Redeeming Religions Folly Seeking Guidance Self Esteem Sharing Spirit's Food The Brain Truth Seeking Unity Virtues Water Will |
__________________________________________________________________________
This site is for Happiness, Health, Unity, Truth- Seeking & Soul--
Worldwide Action & Answers for Us & our World
Lucky's new Blog for Ourselves and Our World
Unity and Soul for Community, Soul- Connection, Healers, TruthSeekers, Happy World Builders, Heart - Helpers, Rebels n More |
|
_______________________________________________________________________________
|
FREE Health non profit--
Happy Fun Health & Water FREE Wellness Support with Laughter & Wellness, "Talk- Listen- Like"; Water-- Health Basic Pure Water Home Systems; Green Home Business |
|
Natural Health at Drug-Free Doc.com / Biocology.com
_________________________________________________________________________________
Free Laughter & Wellness-- Fun Healthy Skills Practice, Let Go & More../ Contact for Invite/ Info
_________________________________________
_________________________________________